The late GrandMaster Peter Urban was not only a Pioneer originating one of the 1^st Martial Arts schools in the USA in 1959 but he was an innovator and somewhat eccentric, eclectic propagator of newer and more modern approaches to the Martial Arts.

GrandMaster Peter Urban, ICMA Convention, NYC

During a period when most martial arts teachers were enamored with “tradition” and committed to following established “traditions” of their oriental  predecessors, Master Urban initiated what many considered a “Sacrilege” as he began to openly deviate from much of the “traditional” mindset and practices that where at the heart of oriental culture, society, and previously had formed a major part of the foundation of oriental martial arts.

To this day, the results of this “Rebellion” are still lauded by some, lamented and criticized by others. However, this PARADIGM CHANGE began a transition in martial arts that is still in progress today; reflected later in many  of the “radical” anti-tradition concepts presented by the late Bruce Lee in the 70′s, exemplified in the multiple variations of the USA GoJu style initiated by GM Urban and further advanced by  his most prominent students, and has become part of the mantra that helps fuel the present “Mixed Martial Arts” phenomenon currently popular today. In contrast, many of Urban’s more radical practices have served to set problematic precedents that have resulted in serious questions concerning credibility in the MA belt ranking system.

As with any prominent figure in history, Grand Master Urban had his remarkable accomplishments along with his “demons”.  With the greatest respect for his many accomplishments, and as one of his closest, long term Senior Students, I have no illusion that this man was a Saint or was without fault.  It is the opinion of this author that only through candid, honest, and critical examination of history will we best move  our martial arts forward. As Winston Churchill stated, “Those who do not learn from the history are destined to repeat it.”

It is not my intention to dwell on the past whether by romanticizing “war stories” and/or “heroes” or by condemning questionable past actions and activities. It is, however, our responsibility as adults, as Senior Masters, and present leaders of the martial arts to view all with a “critical mind”, a mind open to all possibilities but cognizant that not everything is probable, and/or profitable.  Ultimately, I wish to honor one of the valuable principles taught to me by this great martial artist, “KEEP THE GOOD and DISGARD THE BAD”. It is in this spirit that I continue to examine and share, in humility and truth, “THE PETER URBAN SYNDROME”.

Shihan Ric Pascetta & GrandMaster Peter Urban, circa 1977

INTRODUCTION

During a recent online discussion, one of the Master instructors with years of MA experience made a valid and important point when asserting that the Okinawans and Japanese founded their own “styles” and have no monopoly on creativity. To paraphrase his opinion, based on this precedent there is no reason why westerners could not do the same.

The following discourse is an edited version of my response to this current and relevant subject. Please consider my perspective and feel free to submit your personal findings, opinions, and/or share the facts of your own experiences via the interactive “Comments” at the end of this article.

Historical Precedents

First, I agree with my MA brother in acknowledging that no country, culture, or race has a monopoly on intelligence, creativity, talent, and/or the potential for advancing any area of the human experience including the Martial Arts. Beyond that, let’s examine this in the context of the PAST (history), the PRESENT (activity and interaction), and the FUTURE (vision, achievable goals, and inspiration).

A common observance is the fact that in each system (new or old), begins with very similar basics. The differences come with how each “Master” prioritizes, emphasizes, varies, and/or interprets these basics within their martial arts experience and then transmits those interpretations to their students. What follows in that process is simply further progression along the direction set by following those tenants selected and preferred by that particular “Master” teacher. It is significant to remember that William Shakespeare began with the same 26 letters of the alphabet as you and I.  However, no one would argue about what a profound difference there was in his understanding, use and interpretation of their application.

This phenomenon of individual interpretation is not limited to new “style” or any one “Master”, regardless of how prominent he is or is not. It is something that occurs with every serious teacher of the MA.  In my opinion by observation, the potential confusion and sometimes abuse seems to happen when any one of these “interpretations” identifies itself as a “new system” of “unique style”. Therefore, it is prudent for all of us serious students of the MA to clearly define the parameters that distinguish between fact and fantasy, reality and illusion.

Well document in the history of the martial arts is prominent evidence that those “styles/systems” that have definitively been verified as unique, “new systems” are those which have stood the “test of time”, not simply those instructors who proclaimed themselves to be unique and/or chose another name for their MA.

The Test of Time

What I specifically mean by the phrase, “test of time” is not merely counting the number of years any “Master” has spent from the day of his first White belt lesson to the present. Although the total time passed during these two dates can be relevant, this can also create an illusion. This is because the reality of “experience” is not the number of years that have passed but is best verified by how any individual has filled those years! In this manner one examines the QUANTITY, QUALITY, and CONSISTENCY of one’s MA “experience”.

Please let us recognize and agree that “experience” is not realistically measured in “years” but in moments, minutes, hours, and occasionally, days. Abraham Lincoln once said, “And in the end, it’s not the years in your life that count. It’s the life in your years.”

Twenty to thirty years, two-three nights weekly in your garage practicing the techniques you learned in a 6 weeks summer course at the YMCA is distinctly different from 20-30 years impregnated with regular, consistent, and serious training under the direction of a seasoned and credible Master teacher before we even begin to measure other MA activities.

Test of Verifiable MA Activities

Further yet, years of activity teaching, leading, inspiring, mentoring students through multiple levels of MA skills, competitive interaction with other martial artists, social interaction with juniors, peers, and seniors through martial organizations, administrative responsibilities within a credible martial organizational structure and with guidance from senior accomplished leaders, and personal contributions such as written and published material, audio and video productions, martial arts demonstrations, presentations, shows, and/or productions are all indications of a full range of “experiences” that are indicative of a career Martial Arts Master. The participation in the full range of these activities, the consistency of such participation, and the verifiable quality of the same are the only valid criteria that justify any of the mid and higher levels of Black Belt status.

The common error and rather widespread illusion is that one’s advancement in status to the higher Dan levels is merely a matter of counting the years since one began MA training and/or perhaps if he/she knows the moves to more kata or the “accepted” kata list and/or technique list commonly taught within that system. I’m not certain if this discouraging trend has been caused by deliberate “inflation” of the belt rank system or simply because of the ignorance of those who have inherited or independently proclaimed themselves as the present “leaders” of MA.

“Dumbing Down” of MA Standards

It is clear to me that anyone who has not walked the path described above is already  handicapped when attempting to use teaching methods and or standards that he/she has never been taught himself/herself. Subsequently, one might not be surprised at the “dumbing down” of quality in some of the present day martial arts schools. It brings to mind the phrase, “The blind leading the  blind.” Also, the “dumb” don’t always know they are “dumb”. “The knife cuts, but it cannot cut  itself. The eye sees, but it cannot see itself.” (Click the link referencing the previous article on this BLOG site.) Oops, I forgot that it’s not “politically correct” to refer to someone as “dumb”. Perhaps, “rationally challenged” may be a kinder term.

When looking around I don’t see any lack of talent in the now generation. And wherever there is active interaction we see skills increase simply by such interaction, however, there is a distinct difference between what is learned “by accident” and what is learned by design. The only legitimate justification and value of Senior Master instructor status is in our ability to create an environment that allows the now generation to move beyond our own quality levels. In essence, they learn from us so as not to have to redo the same research, reinvent the wheel, repeat the same errors.

Regardless of the cause of this “dumbing down”, it is my sincere belief that a greater benefit to the MA in general is better served by sharing this valuable information and perhaps offering a “hand up’ to those who are less aware for whatever reason, than in acting pomp and superior or degrading anyone who seriously wishes to grow in their MA experience. It is for this reason I take my time and effort to share these views and values. All at the risk that these long monologues may bore some of my MA brothers and sisters and/or offend the enemies of truth.

To continue further, if one has “created” his own “style/system” without the benefit of such “experience” it is likely that such a “style” would potentially be more limited than one formed after such a broad and rich career described above. This is common sense and not intended to take away from any serious creative effort. The result is not greater than the sum of all the parts, this is one of the laws of reality. In modern techno speak, they say of computers, “Garage in, garbage out.”

Subsequently, to be realistic, we must acknowledge that the “credibility” of any “new system” does not begin by that “Master” proclaiming himself “Soke”, Grandmaster” or any other title, nor does it begin with him proclaiming a style name independent of his former teachers. If he has done much of the previously mention activity under the direction and supervision of his seniors and then chooses to separate, forming a new entity, the scrutiny legitimately begins anew. If he has initiated such a bold step but hasn’t experienced and/or accomplished with those seminal activities listed previously, then there is likely to exist a serious “credibility gap” from the inception of any such “new style”.

Politics or Accountability?

GrandMaster Peter Urban @ Ric Pascetta's AMERICA CUP TOURNAMENT circa 1978

One somewhat common observation has been that many of those who have not done their “homework” and/or established the broad foundation necessary for success prior to any independent move have often times been the ones who attempt to cover any scrutiny of their deficiencies by crying “politics” or portraying themselves as “victims” that the established Masters or Organizations are trying to “keep down”. Although “politics” is a part of the “human condition” and exists in every walk of life, any ethical individual must bring the focus on his “real time” actions, activities, and accomplishments rather than affiliations. Actions speak louder than words.

Only after the amount of time and work necessary to establish that someone, in fact, has a uniquely new system of performing and teaching his martial art, will this then be recognized as a new “style/system”. Until then credibility and recognition of MA social status rightly should remain in question. Legitimate proof and verification is not attained merely by any diploma whether issued by a credible teacher or even a group who wish to acknowledge the new “founder’s” rank or status. Unfortunately, as much as these types of “recognitions” give us a “warm and fuzzy” feeling toward our MA brothers, they represent little more than “mutual admiration societies”.

The proof of credibility is in the actual performance, skills, character, and subsequent activity of this “Founder’s” students, his assistants, the instructors he develops, the Master teachers that originate from his teaching and leadership, the organizational structure he creates, inspires, and administers, the quantity and quality of the interaction between him, his students, his representatives with the rest of the MA community, the caliber and character of those martial artists that represent his “new style”, etc.

A Rome Built in one Day, Falls in one Day

This is something that is impossible to accomplish overnight and/or behind closed doors. Therefore, any credible claim to the status/titles such as Soke, GrandMaster, Hanshi, Shihan, Renshi, ad infinitum, comes only after the time necessary to accomplish such things, CERTAINLY NOT AT THE BEGINNING! And the clock measuring this credibility does not start at the beginning of the “Founder’s” MA career, but at the beginning declaration of his alleged, “NEW STYLE”. Still further, as explained above, the passage of time although a necessary factor must be measured relative to actual activity and verifiable accomplishment. The fact that one may have accomplished the foundations needed to likely accomplish these standards now performed independently, only opens the door, but is not a final indication of having fulfilled the ongoing qualifying tasks.

With this said, I admire anyone who is sincere and has the talent, insight, creativity, and courage to embark on such a path. However, please don’t expect to receive the acknowledgement of legitimate achievement until those milestones have been accomplished. Just as we would certainly admire anyone entering college to begin the education and experience to become a “brain surgeon. However, no one would expect to acknowledge that he was a World Class Brain Surgeon while he was a premed student simply because he declared that one day he would arrive at that point and had begun his “research” on finding “new methods” of brain surgery.

It is discouraging, embarrassing, and delusional that some of our MA brothers believe that they can appoint themselves the head of some imagined “NEW STYLE” and immediately identify themselves as “Professor”, “Doctor”, “Reverend”, “Most Supreme POOH PAH”, blah, blah, blah, blah. Let’s get real here.  Are they “Founders”? Perhaps yes. The obvious question remains, “founders of what?”  Do they have a “New Style? Perhaps yes, or perhaps they simply have a variation. Only the test of time as described in part above will determine that. Until then, it must prudently remain questionable.

CONCLUSIONS

I hope this long dissertation helps to clarify this subject and to more thoroughly explain that the questions posed concerning credibility are not personal or political, but are primarily legitimate and reasonable questions regarding understanding, defining, and qualifying specifics and then applying the appropriate ethics and integrity.

When trying to understand why these issues continue to be a such challenge within the MA community I keep being reminded and am drawn to repeat again the quote from William Shakespeare, “THERE IS NOTHING MORE COMMON THAN THE WISH TO BE REMARKABLE.” If, in fact, we wish to truly accomplish something “remarkable”, let us not be known or remembered that what was “remarkable” about our activities and accomplishments was how “remarkably” we exaggerated, distorted, inflated, conned, and/or defrauded others with the description of our MA activities and accomplishments.

Let us be known and remembered for how “remarkable” was our commitment to the developing and maintaining the substance of our skills, the quality of our character, and the integrity of our values. To achieve this goal, we must walk the walk, not just talk the talk; we must be wary of the differences between those around us, and in our industry, of who are the Champions of Integrity and those who are the Enemies of Truth, Transparency, and Accountability.

“…AND THAT’S THE WAY I SEE IT!”  ©

Copyright © 2010  R.V. PASCETTA, All rights reserved

We are honored to have him as a guest author at MARTIAL ARTS INSIDER, and I am blessed to benefit from the wisdom of his counsel. Please enjoy the article and feel free to comment and/or pose questions at the end in the comment section after this article. Our BLOG is set up to be interactive and he will be able to respond directly to any inquiry as his busy schedule permits.

SHIHAN RIC PASCETTA

Hanshi Manny Saavedra - WORLD SANSEI

…the first appearance deceives many; the intelligence of a few perceives what has been carefully hidden.

As a visual reference, a family tree is an excellent way to think about the connections between individuals, especially in large families. Historians often create a family tree, especially when they are looking at the history of royal dynasties, to follow the paths of allegiance and relation between various nations. A family tree can illustrate what exactly a second cousin is, for example, or show you the precise relationship between yourself and your step-great-aunt. In historical situations where families have tended to intermarry, a family tree can sometimes get confusing, and the linear nature is corrupted by lines which appear to sprout in all directions. So it is that we do the same in Karate.

For us in karate, a family tree showcases the connections and history of a family system. Most of us are proud of their relationships to famous these figures, and are delighted to have a family tree illustrating that point. The family tree can serve as a small history lesson of the family, showing the various origins of different members of the family, along with the children (students) they had and when they lived. It can also serve as a memory prompt, because seeing the family member’s name can bring out other pieces of the individual’s history, such as what he or she did that was distinctive or remarkable.

The Art above the Artist

For a tree to proliferate the branches must grow to gather nutrients for the trunk. There are no favorite branches and all are loved, all are part of the living tree. Some branches will survive the winter, some the rain, some will bend with the wind and some will break. Some of the branches will plant seeds. All are needed and are viewed as part of the one, part of the Toa, the natural order of life. It is within this natural order of life that all things must follow, and we as USA Goju lineage must learn to work together one way or another.

We will use the following analogy as a beginning point, as an understanding of our Karate, our discipline, or family united by thought and technique. In this scenario the family of USA Goju began in the mind of its founder in the United States, with the thought of giving us the opportunity to express ourselves in movement in the further development of the intrinsic and extrinsic way of the hard and soft. He was a pioneer in the thought of modern combat systems. Understanding that the roots and the trunk of this tree are the foundation in the developing of modern Goju Karate in America and the brotherhood to which they belong. All branches which have developed throughout the years and all its practitioners, thereafter, owe their birth to Sensei Peter Urban.

My approach to teaching Karate is inspired by both Eastern as well as Western philosophical principles

Satori is a word from the Japanese Zen tradition, which describes the natural harmony of body, mind, and emotions. Only when the mind is free of external distraction, its focus is entirely on the present moment. Only when the spirit is free of obstructing tension, can it manifest as pure motivational energy. Only when the body is fully relaxed and vitalized, can it be sensitive and open to life. The essence of Karate-Do requires responsibility.

The Essence of Karate-Do requires us not to propagate ourselves, but to propagate the art lastly; the essence of Karate-Do entails the development of character.

Gichin Funakoshi Sensei always said the most important aspect of Karate is the development of character. What is character in terms of the philosophy of Karate-Do? Character is simply exercising discipline, exhibiting honor, duty and self-control, and continually adhering to humility. Without character and a strong foundation, nothing of substance can be accomplished. Winning championships is fun, having excellent technique is desirable, understanding kata and bunkai are optimal, but as wonderful as these things are, they should never replace a strong, disciplined character. Masters who have perfected character do not criticize others, nor do they seek the approval and admiration of other men, but rather exist to learn, teach, and develop in the way of karate-do. To develop character is to understand life.

Some would recognize that many of the systems of Karate are the absolute true system or the predominant way of thought in a particular system, however, the strength within this art form known as Gojuryu is in its diversity, its modernization, and its adversity. It’s the principle of dualistic reality, in simple terms all systems must exist and coexist in order for any one system to exist.

Art stimulates different parts of our brains with a whole gamut of emotions. Art gives us a way to be creative and express ourselves. For some people, art is the entire reason they get out of bed in the morning. You could say “Art is something that makes us more thoughtful and well-rounded humans.” You might say “Art is in a constant state of change, so nobody can really pin down what it is.” Now, everything just stated has elements of truth, but is largely based on opinion.

Today our Goju Family has been split up into many factions, not all of whom see eye to eye. However, there are many greats and many unknowns. Our goals and objectives in Karatedo is the same in that of the Toa. You cannot deny some of the differences of life or in Karatedo there will always be those or that which do not understand and those who do. The key, the objective is to achieve harmony. Every system has a base, an originator, and many propagators. All Karatedo are fundamental, your approach, your philosophy, and how you practice and teach your art makes the different. USA Goju-Ryu and all its branches is what it is today because of its leadership worldwide, its strength, and diversity. Every major city has a

Hanshi Saavedra performing Kata

Gojuryu school. All share the same common goals, to heighten the awareness, to show responsibility to the community, belief in human potential, to instill in its practitioners the importance of the work ethic and self actualization of the individual. Here in America we have come full circle, we began as students, we have gone through the ranks, we have paid our dues, we have battles fought and lessons that we’ve learned from our teachers. We have also questioned them, we are not complacent, and we live in current reality and are critical thinkers. We are educated, we are modern traditionalist. We do not follow blindly, nor do we teach blindly, we seek to produce leaders, not followers, now we ask, “Is there a better way.”

The misconception is that the art form we study is an art form that is owned by a country a race, this is far from the truth, Karatedo is and international possession a human possession.

After so many years teaching karate, I have now come full circle. I am back doing what one does when one is beginning as a white belt: training to improve my Karate understanding, not to win in competition. Ironically, the greatest pleasure in karate is felt when one knows absolutely nothing, as a white belt.

Manny Saavedra

Hanshi Saavedra can be reached at the WORLD SANSEI website. http://www.koryugojuryu.com/en/

Shihan Pascetta & GM Urban revising USA GoJu Curriculum - Padova, Italy _ Circa 1977

Today I responded to a post on the Facebook Page: “U.S.A.G.A. Urban System of America GoJu Association“. This post by a U.S.A.G.A.member stated: “It’s time for you to take over U.S.A.G.A….”. Since I take this subject very seriously, I subsequently wish to share the contents of my response to anyone interested in the subject of USA GoJu. Please read below an edited and more thoroughly revised version.

U.S.A.G.A. Urban System of America GoJu Association: Thank you for the kind compliment and expression of trust. However, USAGA is not mine to “take over”. If I was so foolish to attempt that, I would be no different than those others who seem bent of reliving the past, taking advantage of Peter Urban’s legacy, in the face and on the backs of so many other legitimate USA GoJu Masters, a few Senior to me and many Junior to me.

Peter Urban personally taught me that the first step in organization was to label everything “accurately” and the operative word here is “accurately”. No matter how much we wish to romanticize the past, we can never change reality or re-write history.

I strongly suggest that we apply this principle and apply the most “accurate label” to one of the most significant things Peter Urban dedicated his time and attention to until his death. Before anyone could even consider using U.S.A.G.A. as another martial arts organization, he must first “label it accurately“.

Let’s first examine and acknowledge the irrefutable acts we have been witness too. U.S.A.G.A. belonged to Peter Urban and Peter Urban alone. There will never be another Peter Urban. He left us a wealth of valuable information and ideas if we will have the courage to act on those ideas. He did not leave us an “organization”.

If you knew him, truly listened to him, and even read his last will and testament, you cannot miss coming to the conclusion that U.S.A.G.A. was given to us by Peter Urban as way for “Alumni” to interact in a civil and constructive manner. It was never a structure to award rank, belts, titles, or advancement.

There was no standard curriculum in U.S.A.G.A., and no organizational structure. Many of us, his senior students, tried to establish one, however you judge it, he always undercut and/or disassembled whatever we devised. In the entire history of U.S.A.G.A. Peter Urban only appointed two “Directors” other than himself (they were Shihan William Liquori (Florida) and Shihan Ric Pascetta (New Jersey)). However, even these “Directors” were given limited powers of authority and all efforts to organize U.S.A.G.A. like other martial arts organizations were resisted and/or refused by GM Urban. No one else in the entire history of U.S.A.G.A. has ever been elevated to an executive level.

So, let’s stop pretending that U.S.A.G.A. ever was a martial arts “organization” or ever could be one after the clear and definite precedents set by its creator and founder, GM Peter Urban. Let’s apply Urban’s own principle and “label it accurately”. U.S.A.G.A. was and still is a SOCIAL NETWORK of USA GoJu practitioners established by GM Urban long before “social networks” became popularized by the Internet. Nothing more, nothing less!

Any diplomas, ranks, certificates, titles, or awards have NEVER been issued under the authority of U.S.A.G.A.. They have been issued under the authority, credibility, and reputation of Grand Master Peter Urban, himself. If you have doubt, then examine the multiple names for his school, group, or “association” that he used and changed over and over through the years. It is documented, the list is exhausting, and U.S.A.G.A. was only one of them. All anyone has to do is to look at names on the various certificates and “recognition” awards he regularly sent by mail. Read he many newsletters, “Urban Speaks“. None were never consistently U.S.A.G.A. or any other “organizational” name. The only thing consistent in the formal documents issued by Peter Urban was his signature and thumb print!

The significant point here is for us to stop the abusive use of U.S.A.G.A. for the personal gain of any one individual or faction of USA GoJu. Further, to stop the abusive issuing of rank certification, titles, and appointed positions under the illusion that it is from a structured martial arts organization alleged to be in existence for 40-50 years. That is simply not the truth.

Yes, Peter Urban formed his own unique and constantly version of martial arts beginning years ago. He most consistently called it USA GoJu. Yes, he created a network of students, instructors, associates, friends, and fans that he called U.S.A.G.A., along with multiple other names that came to his imagination at any particular time. Anyone who was there to witness this activity and behavior, and is not afraid to share the truth, will confirm the validity of these statements of fact.

So any attempts to “take over” U.S.A.G.A. by me or anyone else would be to perpetuate a lie and constitute unethical practices. I further suggest that if the self appointed, so called “leaders” who are presently attempting to portray themselves as our “leaders” of U.S.A. GoJu and/or U.S.A.G.A. would form their own legitimate martial arts organization under their own names, rather than attempt to steal Urban’s legacy, we would all see somewhat quickly how adept they actually are at forming, structuring, organizing, and operating a real association.

This legacy called U.S.A.G.A. belongs to each of us who has paid our dues over the years and endured to remain active with our individual versions of what Peter Urban taught. THAT IS U.S.A.G.A., nothing more, nothing less.

I call for all USA GoJu practitioners to assert their rights and refuse to participate in action, or group, or leader that tries to make U.S.A.G.A. anything different than Peter Urban intended. Let us, instead enjoy our social interaction, exchange ideas and even training openly, and support those true USA GoJu leaders who have worked so hard to form legitimate Associations, Dojos, or groups of instructors, set solid standards, and continue to act on and develop the legacy left to us by Peter Urban.

Further, I call upon all USA GoJu Black Belts to refuse any “rank advancement” under the guise of U.S.A.G.A.. Let the value of any certification be judged upon the credibility and reputation of the Master who signed it. Don’t be fooled simply because someone started his martial arts activity many years ago. Seniority can only be a limited measure of a Master’s credibility and is often used to hide the real truth of that person’s limited activity during years of his alleged practice, or even his/her poor to mediocre accomplishments during his alleged long years in martial arts.

If any such issuer of advancement certification has compromised their standards, then let them and their followers personally reap the loss of credibility that results from such unethical activity. If issued under the banner of an organization, I caution all to be prudent, to examine if, in fact, that organization truly exists beyond a fancy facade. Examine closely what is it’s documented history and reputation, (not the solely the self serving propaganda supplied on its website or literature), and that is not simply a scheme to mask the actions of some individuals who may hide behind the facade of a grandiose names and inflated, quasi-fraudulent certifications.

In this way serious students and true “Masters” of USA GoJu may stand together and further “TRUTH, JUSTICE, and THE AMERICAN GOJU WAY!”

“…AND THAT’S THE WAY I SEE IT!” ©

Shihan Pascetta - training at traditional GoJu-ryu Dojo, Okinawa - Circa 1987

WALK or TALK?

As I have previously contended, the difference between Martial “Technique” and Martial “Art” is that with Martial Arts training there exists the uniquely specific opportunity for the inclusion of all areas of development of the full human potential: Physical, Intellectual, Emotional, and Spiritual.  The hypothetical search for balance and harmony between these human aspects and the noble principles learned are implied by the term “DO” (DAO), sometimes translated/interpreted as the “WAY” or “PATH”. (Please do not confuse this “Philosophy” with the “Religion” named, “Daoism”, although there may exist some parallels.)

We, however, as martial arts practitioners and alleged leaders have a much greater responsibility to “WALK the  WALK”, not just “TALK the TALK”. As with many other human endeavors, our flowery words sound wonderful and can be inspiring to many. The primary issue presented along with these “ethics” is the challenge to each of us to put our high sounding words and philosophy into ACTION.  “Congruous ACTION forms the substance of any alleged philosophy.”

In recent years we have experienced quite a disappointing degradation of the Integrity, Respect, and Honor in the Martial Arts. These changes have been facilitated by too many martial arts leaders and practitioners (including Asian, Western, European, and Middle Eastern) who tend to apply such high standards when in judgment of other’s actions but regularly find convenient excuses for their own lapses of integrity and honesty.

It seems that the competition for acceptance and maintenance of our individual place in the “pecking order” within the world of martial arts has successfully tempted many (even the previously credible) martial artists to exaggerate, distort, manipulate, and otherwise rationalize their own departure from truth/reality and from the very values and ethics they fervently preach about.  It has been quite interesting to observe how so many have conveniently attempted to re-write, amend, and downright distort their own history and even that of others when it serves their purpose.

William Shakespeare once said, “There is nothing more common than the desire to be remarkable.” (Quite profound!) Where else, other than in martial arts and religion, can an unremarkable individual present themselves as “remarkable” with little real evidence to support such preposterous claims? In what other activity can an individual with minimal education, research, and pertinent, verifiable actions and/or accomplishments claim the status of “Master”, “Grand Master”, Hanshi, Shihan, Soke, and/or any of a plethora of grandiose titles ad nauseum? Where else can individuals create a pseudo-persona with the stroke of a pen, an embroidered belt/sash, and a slick website while those of credible substance look the other way and continue to play this game of “The Emperor’s New Clothes”?

On the  other hand, some martial artists are second only to overly religious individuals in their self-righteous application of their values and ethics upon others while forgiving themselves for even more egregious compromises of the same. (Please note that this statement is not intended as an indictment of anyone who has a sincere, profound faith or personal relationship with the Creator of all things. If, in fact, you do feel convicted by this statement, the perhaps you may consider examining the profound difference between man-made “religion” and GOD inspired “relationship”.) In the Bible, the Book of Matthew (Chapter 7, verse 3, 4, & 5), the author states: “And why do you look at the speck in your brother’s eye, but do not consider the plank in your own eye? Or how can you say to your brother, ‘Let me remove the speck for your eye’; and look, a plank is in your own? Hypocrite: first remove the plank from your own eye, and then you will see clearly to remove the speck from your brother’s eye.” NKJV

Shihan Pascetta - Teaching at AGKI Dojo, Hurffville, NJ - Circa 1974

7 STEPS toward Integrity, Honor, and Respect

Therefore, I challenge everyone within the reach of these words (starting with myself)  to make a personal pledge to execute the following 7 STEPS:

1.) First, CLEAN YOUR OWN  HOUSE.  Begin by taking a long hard look in the mirror.

2.) RESIST focusing on the shortcomings of others. Save your efforts and energy for more constructive goals.

a.) This does not mean to ignore dishonesty or falsity. If honest men do not stand up for honest words and their congruent actions then evil will prevail. Be advised to remember that a “half truth”  is simply a disguising word for a “lie”.

b.) The best way to flush out dishonesty is to humbly demonstrate and/or present that which is honest directly next to what is dishonest. (The operative word here is “humbly”. )

c.) People are not stupid, they will see the contrast for themselves, can make their own evaluations, and form their own opinions.

d.) Those who are not interested in honesty deserve the consequences of their own choices, so allow them to suffer what they choose! Many times “pain” is the best school master anyway.

3.) BE ENCOURAGED to find the COURAGE to admit (first to yourself) those exaggerations, partial truths, and excesses that you have tolerated to seep  into your own actions and with those under your charge.

a.) Remember that true “COURAGE” is not the absence of fear, rather it is the taking of action in spite of fear.”

b.) It takes much courage to admit your own errors and misjudgments. First, to yourself, and when appropriate, to others who matter.

4.) TAKE ACTION, be the first to change direction and turn from this behavior. In doing that, let those actions serve as a living, breathing example of real “ETHICS”.

5.) BECOME the “LEADER” by doing these things first . That, in itself, will be “REMARKABLE”!

6.) REMEMBER, also that  “INTEGRITY IS WHAT YOU DO WHEN NO ONE ELSE IS WATCHING!”

a.) One definition of “Illusion” is when one creates the appearance of reality out non-reality.

b.) A definition of “Delusion” is when one actually believes his own propaganda!

7.) A “LEADER” is someone who does something first.

a.) If you honestly consider yourself to be a TRUE LEADER then be first do what is right by your own actions, regardless of any immediate and/or temporary gain or loss.

b.) You may actually surprise someone!

Shihan Pascetta (Sai) & Master R.G. Bowling (Bo)- Okinawa - Circa 1987

PART OF THE SOLUTION OR PART OF THE PROBLEM?

It is long past due in this world that PEOPLE of CHARACTER begin to “MAKE IT REAL”, to “BE REAL” and then to continue to “KEEP IT REAL”.  This CALL TO ARMS applies not only “IN THE DOJO” but more significantly, “IN EVERYDAY LIFE” among your family, friends, and community. Only then will we truly become “DOERS of the WAY” rather than merely “TALKERS of the WAY”.

I exhort you to let your daily actions become the most profound “teacher” of your alleged philosophy. Only then will we return to our rightful role to remain relevant and make any significant difference in today’s society where the “anti-hero” has become glorified while the wholesome men and women sincerely seeking righteousness and truth have more commonly become marginalized and even ridiculed.  If you do not purpose in your heart to make your actions part of the solution, then you will ultimately resign yourself to being a part of the problem. The choice is yours and yours alone.

TAKE NOTICE AND GOVERN YOURSELF ACCORDINGLY.

“….AND THAT’S THE WAY I SEE IT!“©

This instructor explained the challenges he endured when he attempted to add an MMA program to his curriculum, subsequently resulting in a significant degree of dissatisfaction. You can find his original comments written at the end of my previous article titled, “MMA vs. Tradition – Part 4“.

In these comments submitted by my second generation student, he included the “lessons” he had learned from not so positive experience. Part 2 of this series, written below, is a continuation of my responses and remains in context with his comments.

Shihan Pascetta & Grandmaster Urban, circa 1977

REFLECTIONS

Many years ago, as a young Sensei and long before the recent MMA popularity, I also made some mistakes similar to those lamented by my student’s student in Part 1 of this series. In a sincere attempt to remove what I mistook for “egoism” from my teaching I began to replace the somewhat formal structure in my dojo and began to run it more like a “coach” in a “gym”.

I became lax with dojo protocol such as exchanging courtesies (bowing, etc.) We called each other by first name and even socialized outside the dojo more like “peers”. It wasn’t until much later that I realized how significantly this began “blurring the lines” separating student and Master teacher, particularly, the responsibility to “set the example” that any strong leader and/or mentor must do and not allow himself to become “one of the boys”.

What subsequently occurred shortly after was that it became more and more difficult for me to teach some of the students who had begun to reach a relatively proficient level (with regards to fighting skills). A large part of this change was because our overall relationship had changed from one that clearly separated “mentor” and “student” to one that more closely resembled “peers”.

Due to the liberal extra-curricular interaction and the protocol changes in the dojo, some advanced students affected simply began to treat me as a peer in the dojo rather than to respect the many years of experience that I had in comparison with their own. The social undercurrent in the dojo began to denigrate to more of a “buddy-like” structure and the undercurrent of individual “opinion” began to overshadowed the wisdom and leadership based on real experience.

Needless to say, after a time, this handicap caused me to become less able to benefit those students. Even some of the less advanced students were confused by the varied conflicting “opinions” of the “seniors” they looked up to.  My attempts to lead these newly “enlightened ones” in the right direction became more and more frustrated.

“YOGA-GOJU”?

For example, on one occasion I returned from my training in the State Police Academy to find one of my assistants had added a practice to the regular class of beginners that was totally foreign to our system and to what I had taught him. Since I was temporarily dependent on him to cover some classes while I was away at the academy, he took it upon himself while I was out of class to add his own “innovations” to our well established method of teaching.

He had taken a night course at the local high school that included some practices from yoga. Since he personally liked what he learned, he decided to add some of those practices to our regular program. The fact is that with a very brief exposure to “yoga” he arbitrarily took some of the practices from that beginner yoga class and added his own distorted and mystical twist to them. Although there are many interesting and positive things to learn from yoga and many other disciplines, he had no concept of how these practices either fit or conflicted with our method and overall system of teaching. He had no idea even of the qualifications of the “instructor” teaching in the 6 week adult education evening program!

Further, he had neither the experience, qualifications, or authority to make arbitrary changes in our practices and procedures. What may be readily missed here by the inexperienced practitioner is the fact that the senior instructor or “Master” in any school ultimately has the responsibility for the effect of any curriculum and/or procedural change on all students of all that is taught or practiced in that school.  All means all!

Here was a classic example of a novice, inexperienced assistant adding content on a whim to a quality program without any awareness of its long term impact on the students’ development. What was even more evident was the mindset of such an unqualified, inexperienced assistant making curriculum decisions on his own whim and ego. Obviously, this caused somewhat of a conflict in leadership within the Dojo and confused some students.

INDEPENDENCE or INTERDEPENDENCE?

What then occurred was similar to the experience lamented by my student’s student in his comments. The very students, to whom I had dedicated my time and trust, found a “source” where they could receive teaching “certification” without meeting the high standards of our program.

This would be akin to an academic student attending high school for a few years, then purchasing a “Mail Order” diploma and subsequently claiming to be a college Professor based on that certification! Within a few months they opened a facility close by, using my logos, using a watered down version of my curriculum, the system name, and reputation I had worked so hard to establish in that region, all while now claiming to be “Masters” of the same.

In the meantime, my own livelihood and family was challenged by the affect on my business. What a mess. When I protested, their propaganda to the uninformed public was that I simply was trying to “control” them or block them for succeeding as I had done. The false statements and the illusion presented was that these students simply wanted to be “independent” and “do their own thing”.

The sad fact of the matter was if they legitimately wished to be “independent” then why would they continue to remained connected by copying what their teacher had created and developed? If they sincerely wanted to “do their own thing” then they could have easily achieved that by also choosing their own unique name for their “system”, a curriculum that was significantly different, and logos that were distinctively unique to their own methods. To this day, those lines are still blurred for some people in our area due to my own error and misconception about the importance of the structure in the dojo, regardless of my best intentions.

This acknowledgment of my own mistakes in no way relieves culpability from their choice to exaggerate their own accomplishments and experience. It also does not relieve culpability from the “Grand Master” and “Association” that provided certificated for false and inflated ranking and status. If, in fact, the diplomas they received were truly considered legitimate by that “organization”, or that “Grand Master”, then logically it must be deducted that a Brown Belt or Probationary 1st Dan by my standards and in our organization is equal to a 4th Dan in theirs. This is quite a distinct comparison and self- indictment of their standards. Further, these types of errors are clearly not errors based on good intentions. They are clearly errors based in personal and professional ethics.

In taking responsibility for my own mistake in this example, this experience represented a few minor examples of the numerous problems that resulted due to the change in the structure of relationship between students and Master as well as the change of formal dojo protocol. It literally took years to undo this mistake in policy and procedure.

Ultimately, what I discovered was that the “structural protocol” in the dojo that I had begun to abandon was less about “ego” and “hierarchy” and more a daily reminder of the important and distinctly different, interdependent roles of student and teacher, senior and junior, along with the responsibilities that came with more advanced ability. Every time that the Master is addressed formally or the Black Belts as “Mister” or “Ms.” It serves as a reminder to those  leaders that they are in a position of responsibility. It also serves a reminder to the students that they should expect a higher level of performance and responsibility from those who have earned that formal address.

I have deliberately left out the names from this story because what is most important is the lesson learned, not some political rehashing of old conflicts. I will point out, though, that some of my subsequent protégés continued to be impacted by this mess even years after.

To the degree that they were able to rise above it, subsequent student/instructors have benefited from the resulting quality level in terms of the “character” of students, as well as technical level, of those carrying our system forward that occurred after the change back to a more conservative protocol and structure. To the degree that they have promoted deviation from the time-tested structure (typically with the best intentions to encourage some type of “individualism”) those future generations may have inherited the tendency to open themselves up for some of the same situations recently experienced and described by my student’s student in his comments.

COMPARE, EVALUATE, ASSESS, ADJUST

It is my opinion that each person must take responsibility to use his own intelligence and must do his own assessments. The proceeding “War Story” was not intended as an indictment of any particular student or instructor. I have the highest respect for most of the instructors who have gotten their initial foundation from our organization and I continue to maintain a constructive and positive relationship with almost all of with them. I have shared this “story”, however, and intend for it to be used as a tool for sincere self-scrutiny and self-assessment.

These well intended “mistakes” that some instructors like me have experienced further underscore another reason why any teacher of Martial Arts would benefit greatly from continuing his relationship with his teacher and perhaps, even the teacher of his teacher. This is one of the more realistic advantages to belonging to any legitimate MA organization.

That proposition is presented with the assumption that such an teacher and/or organization, hypothetically, fosters such vales and creates opportunities for all instructors to grow in that direction. It is also assuming that the individual leaders in these roles have a track record of stable behavior and wisdom.

Those leaders must not only possess technical skills, organizational skills, and motivational skills, but they must “walk the walk”, not simply “talk the talk”. This is not a matter of technical skill but primarily a  matter of character and ethical behavior.

In my article series, “MMA vs Tradition” you can see that I sincerely respect the many benefits of both MMA and “Tradition”, however, what seems to be the best road, is a true balance between both worlds. This “best of both worlds” model should hypothetically possess the versatility of technique and the striving for “realism” that many MMA programs attempt. Along with that, however, it must also possess the value system and structure that is one of the core goals of a more “Traditional” MA program and that potentially contributes to molding the “whole” individual.

Unfortunately, this combination of “old” and “new” is a rare occurrence and difficult to find. Our AGKAI standards, system, and methods are an example of my best attempt to accomplish that blend. With that stated, our system is still imperfect and evolving but will continue to evolve in that direction until I can no longer teach.

EVOLUTION vs. REVOLUTION

On a final note, please distinguish between “Evolution” and “Revolution”. The evolution of any structured system takes a careful and disciplined investment of time and resources along with much patience. Although some “mistakes” are inevitable in any type of progressive development, they are typically smaller and more easily managed. Any “damage” done that is due to instructor error is usually limited to a small number of students, lasts for a relatively brief period of time, and is typically “fixable” with diligent review.

Every teacher, in every type of education must honestly admit that their ability to produce a higher quality of student will likely be less when they are at the beginning of their career and likely greater with more experience. These differences are more likely counter-balanced when that teacher is under the guidance and supervision of other more experienced teachers. The problem with too many martial arts schools is that too many “instructors” begin to teach independently long before they have established the experience to recognize their own fallacies.

This is yet another argument supporting the need for professional MA organizations that provide such support, guidelines, and supervision. In fact, it is this author’s opinion that these positions of leadership, guidance, and mentoring are the primary justifications for the higher ranks of Black Belt, not simply time in grade. Those higher degrees of Black Belt represent, “Teachers of Teachers” and the administrators of those organizations become the “Leaders of Leaders”.

The tasks and skill sets required to become a “Teacher of Teachers” are part technical, and part administrative. The tasks, skill sets, and accomplishments to become a “Leader of Leaders” are also part technical and administrative, however, they also require a level of charisma, and of ethical wisdom. “Leaders” who are lacking in those areas produce followers who are also lacking in those areas. “Leaders” who possess such a combination of these qualifications produce strong students, strong Black Belts, Master instructors possessing both knowledge and wisdom, and ultimately produce future charismatic leaders.

Contrasting with “Evolution”, in any “Revolution” the changes are dramatic, more drastic. With most “Revolutions” some things will be permanently “damaged” or be completely lost. Blood is drawn and people are seriously injured and/or inevitably die. I hope you can follow my descriptive analogy.

Subsequently, “revolutionary” changes in any system of MA training (i.e. when an instructor suddenly emerges with some “new”, innovative creation of his “own system”) typically are short lived and rarely remain relevant in MA culture for the long run. In my MA career I have witnessed a number of “shooting stars” that fell back to earth even more quickly than they exploded on the MA scene.

Those which do last usually undergo some repeated changes over a longer period of time and leave behind yet another group of individuals/students whose perception of the process may be forever mutated, not unlike adult children from “dysfunctional” families. This phenomenon results in a repeat of the same nonsense, over and over again, based upon and “justified” by the less than reasonable actions of the original perpetrator. This is akin to a type of martial arts “incest” where the “interbreeding” ultimately succeeds in producing a weaker and weaker offspring, handicapped both physically and mentally. There is a lot to be said for the old adage, “The apple doesn’t fall far from the tree”.

It is this author’ opinion that a large part of any lack of credibility of certain practitioners/Masters (alleged) of USA GoJu is due to this type of dysfunction. What is sad is that some of these individuals have no clue as to what is necessary to achieve the level they claim to be. They are incapable of that awareness because it was never honestly taught to them and subsequently they have never experienced the normal progression leading up those levels or ever legitimately accomplishing those levels.

What is even more pathetic is that many of those who legitimately have such awareness pretend as though this crisis in credibility doesn’t exist. Remember the age old fable of “The Emperor’s New Clothes” (by Hans Christian Anderson). This is unfortunate but true when applied to more MA Masters than I would like to mention.

GIVING BACK

It is my motivation (and that of any sincere MA Master) to “give back” to MA by passing the results of a lifetime of dedication and passion on to the next generation. It is not the intention to teach such structure in order to “limit’ students or “control” them. My motivation is to use such structure to create an atmosphere that will ultimately “free” them to take the goals and practices that are our common passion forward, hopefully to an even higher level. This “atmosphere” in the Dojo is a critical element leading to the appropriate intellectual and emotional development that most MA claim to foster. If we do not learn from history we are destined to repeat it (Winston Churchill).

With time, age, and wisdom, we learn that “to give” is always greater that “to receive”. It’s not that we don’t wish to receive anything for our efforts and I’m not suggesting to not expect fair and reasonable financial compensation for your work. I am talking about the difference between a “shepherd” and a “wolf”. The shepherd will risk his life for the sheep, while the wolf will hunt them down, capture, maim, destroy, and devour the sheep. In my opinion, the true MA Master must be a “shepherd”, not a “wolf”.

Unfortunately, the majority of the MMA I have seen out there seems to lend itself more often to the latter. No matter how dramatic and appealing the “cage” spectacle may seem, presently it is based on a short term mentality. Remember that any “champion” is only a “champion” for that day. Until and unless he repeatedly reaffirms that status ad infinum, eventually he will fade in history.

As a MA Master, your accomplishments are forged into the lives of the hundreds/thousands of students you touch with your potentially life changing skills and knowledge. Their future students (if they teach), but also their own children, families, co-workers and society around them can be impacted for generations to come. That, my friends, is “paying it forward” and “long term” thinking.

I am sorry for anyone who has had a less than positive teaching experience, but then again, I’m not so sorry. Remember that “PAIN” is most times the best “teacher”. It leaves us with a lesson that is not easily nor quickly forgotten.

I greatly appreciate what was shared by my student’s student, with his candid comments concerning his own personal observations. It certainly served as an inspiration for this article. I wish all the best of luck to with their teaching and training. I hope this discussion can open the eyes of those who most need to make some changes. I further hope that it will also open us all, as martial artists, for sincere dialogue to continue to improve our own methodology and ethical behavior.

So now you’ve read it, “The GOOD, the BAD, and the UGLY”.

“….AND THAT’S THE WAY I SEE IT!”®

Copyright 2010, R.V.Pascetta, all rights reserved.

Return to PART 1 of this series

Go to “Questions/Comments” Page

This instructor explained the challenges he endured when he attempted to add an MMA program to his curriculum, subsequently resulting in a significant degree of dissatisfaction. You can find his original comments written under my previous article titled, “MMA vs. Tradition – Part 4“.

In these comments submitted by my second generation student, he began his discourse using the term “Traditional” when referring to the his use of the USA GoJu system of Martial Arts. My responses began in that context.

Shihan Pascetta - Okinawa 1987

What is “Traditional”?

The issue that I would like to point out first is a discrepancy. I am suggesting a more accurate use of the term, “traditional”. First, USA GoJu has been anything but “traditional”. It has been a hybrid system since Grand Master Peter Urban broke from Yamaguchi’s GoJu-Kai in the early 60′s. Remember that he studied under three very accomplished Masters, Richard Kim (Okinawan Shorinji-Ryu Kempo), Gogen Yamaguchi (Japanese Goju-ryu). and Masatatsu Oyama (Kyokushin, which included elements of Shotokan, GoJu-ryu, and Thai boxing).

In reality, the MA taught by GM Urban was a hybrid system. It was based on the primary and foundational concepts, principles, and kata of GoJu-ryu, yet included pertinent elements that he learned from GM Kim and GM Oyama. In addition, GM Urban was very innovative, adding his own unique flair, some that came from his own creative mind and much that resulted from some very practical research and study.

The 1^st MMA

The above description is the heritage of what some presently call, USA GoJu. It was arguably one of the first real “Mixed Martial Arts” in the USA. The most profound difference, however, was this system was truly taught as a Martial “ART”, not simply a conglomeration of Martial “TECHNIQUES”.

To take this history of USA GoJu even further into the present generation, we can add my own personal contributions to this “Tradition”. I began my own MA training in 1963 and stated my teaching career in 1969. As my own skills evolved, I personally continued in a “tradition” initiated by GM Urban by refining my version of USA GoJu toward an even more modern and sophisticated system. The present-day system of AGKI (Ric Pascetta’s American GoJu Karate-do International) has now been influenced and modified, based on almost 50 years of my own personal experiences in MA, life, personal evolution, and my extensive research.

I would like to clarify, though, that this refinement was done while still maintaining the foundation and core principles I learned directly from both Sensei Verycken (my 1^st Master teacher in USA GoJu) and GM Urban’s core system of GoJu-ryu. This should be understood and viewed in direct contrast between some MA practitioners who advocate “mixing” numerous MA “styles” and arriving at a conglomerate of all those styles. Another distinct difference is that in my case, I never intended to “create” a “new system”, or to arbitrarily, “mix” styles. My style has remained USA GoJu in principle, substance, and theory. What has evolved is a uniquely modern and practical method possessing versatility, depth, and sophistication of training methods.

The earlier reference to “mixing” styles can easily result in an incongruent mismatch of martial techniques. Although, there may be a wide variety of techniques in such a model thereby suggesting “versatility”, the application and transition from one type of technique to the other might more likely be confusing and difficult to “flow” or to be applied naturally.

Not all elements from one system fit congruently with those of another, regardless of how valuable they are as “stand alone” techniques. One similar analogy may be that of trying to fit the carburetor from a Volkswagon onto a Ferrari engine. Both carburetors may be effective as a “stand alone” part but neither is designed or engineered to function on the other engine.

AGKI Method – the “New Generation”

The AGKI (American GoJu Karate-do International) method evolved while maintaining continuity from the basics to the most advanced application with each skill set building upon the previous. This follows a design that allows the practitioner to readily transition from one skill level to the next and in practical application. It is designed to transition efficiently from one type of physical situation to another.

With regard to the “sport” aspect, this approach has allowed our athletes to readily transition from “tradition” sport karate rules, to point fighting rules, to continuous and “full contact” kickboxing rules, to MMA rules, and ultimately to real life self defense application. A significant reason for that is that the foundation of basics and the emphasis on practical execution of those basics provides a more stable platform for more advanced execution and application.

During my earlier developmental years, I didn’t “hide in the closet” while practicing my MA, but made it my practice to interact with many of the most accomplished Masters and fighters from multiple MA disciplines throughout the World. It is my prejudice that the modernization and sophistication of our version of “American GoJu” can be clearly observed by the noting the distinct difference in the consistent quality of Black Belt students AGKAI has produced, worldwide.

The original instructor of the student/instructor inspiring this article was initially my student. Although he spend some time under the direction of GM Urban, the primary and central physical basis of the system he taught, follows what he learned directly from me with a some deviations. This was quite different from the older version taught by GM Urban.

“AMERICAN GOJU”

My consistently called my version of USA GoJu, “American GoJu” (this was even before GM Urban started to mingle this term with the many other names he used; i.e. USA GoJu, GoJu-do, Gojulandia, Urban System of America (USA) GoJu, the Fight School Network, etc.) This personal version has evolved to become much more versatile, while maintaining the emphasis on practical application that has been the trademark of most MA that has evolved from GM Urban’s students. Anyone can confirm that the term, “American GoJu Karate”, has even been the formal name of my business from the early 70′s (and incorporated).

This was long before it became popular for GM Urban or any other USA GoJu practitioners to use that term. Remember that during and after the Vietnam War it became less popular to use the term “American” but I did it deliberately in direct opposition to what I considered un-American.

In all fairness, it is important to acknowledge that Sensei Verycken has also used the term “American GoJu” at brief times but even his own association was called, “Nekowashi”. Only in the recent years after the death of GM Urban has he begun to place any significant emphasis on this term again.

In direct contrast to that history, beginning in 1979 and more formally in 1980, I founded the AGKAI (American GoJu Karate Association, International). My use of the term “American GoJu Karate” as the specific defining description of the MA I taught has been consistent since the early 70”s.

Birth of A.G.K.A.I.

I founded A.G.K.A.I. in the USA. Italy, and Israel after being told by GM Urban to become independent and to start my own style. I did not, in fact follow his advice (to create my own “style”) for many reasons that are too complicated to discuss here. However, with the help of some other excellent USA GoJu masters, I founded this organization and used the less common term, “AMERICAN GOJU KARATE” as a way to specifically distinguish our version if USA GoJu from that of GM Urban and his other students.

Unfortunately, today many USA GoJu practitioners have begun to interchange that term “American GoJu”, with USA GoJu. It has placed AGKAI members in a somewhat difficult position when trying to remain autonomous. This is partially because it can be argued that since GM Urban was “American” and he was the first “American” 10^th Dan, that his system technically could also be called “American GoJu”.

The problem with this position is that GM Urban deliberately chose to use a multitude of other names for both his system and organization(s) other than “American GoJu Karate” and did not begin to use this reference with any regularity until I popularized it. Even more so, he loosely used the term after I chose it for our organizational name. The difficult part of this for myself and other AGKAI members is that it subsequently blurs the lines I deliberately created between AGKAI and the rest of the lineage originating from GM Urban.

Those who have remained part of U.S.A.G.A. (USA GoJu) rightfully claim and follow the old teachings of GM Urban. These include certain training techniques and methods specifically taught by GM Urban and maintained by these practitioners. In contrast, those in A.G.K.A.I. have been taught a “New Generation” of USA GoJu (AMERICAN GOJU) and they follow a modernized curriculum that was established structurally and has continued to evolve since 1979.

Perhaps this may seem petty or insignificant to others, however, they were not the ones who put in the hard work and dedication to develop a unique and separate identity. Further, it is only fair to distinguish clearly between the “old ways” and the “new ways”. With the death of such an iconic figure as GM Urban, many USA GoJu practitioners have jumped on the bandwagon in efforts to imitate what they supposed GM Urban did in real life.

Although we acknowledge, appreciate, and respect all that GM Urban has taught and has given to us, we are not motivated to repeat or mimic the past. We are committed to stay current and relevant with our practice of Martial Arts while building on the solid foundation of those who came before us.

“Keep the good, discard the bad”

Although I believe that I and all of GM Urban’s students should appreciate and should never forget the contributions he gave to us, we are not, and never will be Peter Urban. It is my opinion that if one truly wanted to “follow” in his legacy, they would realize that we need to refrain from romanticizing his life and simply build upon the many positive things he taught. One of his primary principles was to “keep the good, discard the bad”.

Any of us that knew him personally could attest witnessing quite a number of “bad” things that GM Urban did regularly that were contrary to core Martial Arts principles. This last statement must be viewed accurately and in context. It is not intended to cast anything negative on a truly great MA Master and Pioneer, but to simply recognize that he was human and not above scrutiny.

This mind set I am advocating is just as he had done, setting the example to scrutinize any and all around him, including his own training roots. He spoke with respect for the Masters who taught him and for all he had learned from his own MA roots. His actions, however, were to build upon those roots, making his own path, and consequently his own unique system.

Further, if we are to be true to “ourselves, martial arts, and country” we must learn not only from our teachers positive advancements but we must also learn from his apparent mistakes and failings. To do otherwise is foolishness. To do otherwise places us in the likely position to repeat his mistakes.

Regardless, and despite that history, I understand what my student’s student was referring to when using the term “traditional”. Because as eclectic as the various versions of GoJu-ryu have become, those who legitimately teach this system still attempt to teach a system of Martial Arts that includes the full development of the individual student (physically, intellectually, emotionally, and spiritually). This aspect of “traditionalism” is in direct contrast to many of the more recent, popular, and commercial approaches to teaching MA (many times under the banner of “MMA”).

Mentor vs. Coach

The character values that are taught in “Martial Arts” ( as contrasted to “Martial Techniques”) only come to fruition when an instructor is able to create a distinctly different type of relationship between the himself and the student. Without that relationship the student becomes merely another athlete who will typically move from “coach” to “coach” seeking only his own selfish ends. That type of arrangement can be physically productive but is a mere shadow of the potential that comes when any student has a true “mentor” rather than simply a “coach”.

Even the many more technically modernized systems (less “traditional”) of MA that retain this age old foundation are more likely to produce a more balanced student who looks beyond his most recent sport “victory” in the “cage” or anywhere else. This close relationship between Sensei and student is unique and that is the reason that you can see such a different result.

It has been my observation that the typical MMA program tends to foster a very self aggrandizing, egocentric mindset. In contrast, the time tested older methods, whether strictly “traditional” (such as those who attempt to follow all aspects from their Asian roots) and/or the more modern versions (such as ours [AGKI] that keep the older values but have evolved more technically), produce individuals who realize that they are part of a “family” not a just a member of a “gym”. The relationship between Sensei/student in the “older systems” is founded upon “who” they are rather than “what” they are (how talented, or how successful).

This type of relationship parallels the dynamics that typically occur in a regular family. In a functional family the parents, hypothetically, have some offspring who may be more or less accomplished yet this doesn’t change the love, the commitment, or the feeling the parent has for each child. The relationship remains secure whether he becomes a janitor or the President.

Unfortunately, since MMA has received such expanding exposure in the entertainment media, the general public who are attracted to this “sport” are more likely to gravitate to any local program that resembles what they see on TV.

The comments of my student’s student clearly demonstrate that he has now learned by experience that our roles as true leaders are not to cater to the “flavor of the month” or current popularity. As MA leaders we must maintain the character to “stay the course” and teach what we know is the best. We need to not blur the lines as many more “commercial” schools do by catering to the public, simply fulfilling their latest desire.

The more popular approach may make for greater financial success at first, but many times at the sacrifice of what I believe we were entrusted to pass on. It is always a fine line to walk for any MA professional. Of course, we must all “pay the rent”, however, do we learn to do that by following better ethical business practices or do we do it by “selling out” the core principles because it is easier to “sell” the sizzle than the bacon? If we allow the public popularity to take the lead, it is like the “tail wagging the dog” or analogous to the son trying to tell the father how to “make babies”.

“….AND THAT’S THE WAY I SEE IT!”®

Copyright 2010, R.V.Pascetta, all rights reserved.

Please check back next week to read “Part 2” of this series, including such sub-topics as: “Reflections”, “Yoga-GoJu”, “Independence vs. Interdependence”, “Evolution vs. Revolution”, “Giving Back”, etc.

Go to “Questions/Comments” Page

MAI Team

Thank you for your patience over the last few days as we have added some significant upgrades to help make our site more user friendly.

We have added an upgraded Comment system. This allows Comments and responses to remain posted together when replying directly to any comment. The Comment box will now expand as you write. There is now a feature that allows Comments to be posted directly from Facebook. It also allows for photos to be added with your Comments.

At the top right on the Side Panel you can select either English or Italian translations of our site content. Our site content is now fully bilingual with the Italian translation of each Page and Article (Post) on its own separate pages, all grouped together under the Italian section. In this way the “Comments” in Italian will also match the translated articles.

Unfortunately, due to technical issues we are not able to transfer previous comments from the original posts to the recreated Italian language posts. Since we originally had the Italian translations on the same page as the original English translation, we can not move them but they will remain there. We apologize for any confusion as both English and Italian past comments are all listed under the original English translations of the appropriate articles. All future posts, however, will now remain with the appropriate language translation where they are posted.

On the right Side Panel you will find “Recent Articles“, however, you will also find “Categories” where the articles are categorized into groups under various topics. This should  help to find and/or follow articles with similar themes or in a series. At the end of each article are links to similar articles.  Where the article is part of a longer series, we have added links at the end of each article that will take you directly forward to the next article in that series or back to the previous article in the same series.

It is our desire to continue to make our Blog more accessible and simpler to use. Thank you for your input and we  look forward to your continued interaction on our site.

SHIHAN PASCETTA

Shihan Pascetta

Have you ever been presented the question, “What would be the results in a confrontation between a “street fighter” and a martial artist?” I have been challenged with this question on many occasions along with the subsequent debate that typically follows. In the following discussion, perhaps we can shed some light on this age-old question.

Throughout my career functioning in roles as a Martial Artist, Security Operative/Consultant, as a Police Officer, and as a private citizen, I have had the opportunity to observe, experience, and record various situations which have given me a perspective that is beyond simple speculation and theory.

In any thorough discussion of this subject we must begin with the following fact of reality. First, any real life confrontation is primarily a matter between the specific individuals participating along with the logistical factors that may influence the results.

When we begin to change these variables, then the result is also likely to change. Therefore, it is important to begin with the realization that our conclusions are more a matter of probability rather than a concrete reality. We would be in error to assume that, hypothetically, such results would remain the same in any or every occurrence.

An example of this logic would be as follows:  If a driver hypothetically made a conscious decision to run through every red light on every journey, that is still not a guarantee that he will be in an accident every time he takes this risk. However, this behavior would profoundly increase the “probability” that he would be involved in an accident. This would be in contrast with a driver who was careful to stop at every red light. The reality is that it is actually possible for the risky driver to never have an accident, however profound the probability for such an accident. Therefore, we must always consider the unlikely results as well as the likely results.

The “Street Fighter”

Before proceeding further it is pertinent to define what characteristics are generally viewed as common to the term, “Street fighter”.  Be advised that variations on these characteristics could easily change the final conclusions. Typically I envision a “Street Fighter” as a combatant who is somewhat undisciplined, unregimented, yet an instinctive, unstructured, freeform fighter.

When referring to this term I am specifically including the following characteristics:

1.) A person who has very limited or no formal training in Martial Arts.

2.) A person who has real life experience with physical confrontations on the streets(uncontrolled) in a non-sport environment.

3.) A person who has lived in an environment where physical encounters have been a normal and/or necessary part of his/her survival mechanism.

Assuming that our hypothetical “Street fighter” possesses all these characteristics then we can begin to examine the advantages he/she may possess in any encounter. One of the most significant elements of a person who has been placed in a “survival’ environment, dependent upon  his own mental, emotional, and physical attributes to succeed, is that such an individual already has experiences to some degree the mindset of a “warrior”. Part of this mindset is the acceptance of the fact that he must be responsible for his own survival regardless of the variables and beyond the typical protection or typical rules of society.

In “war” there are no rules. I do not mean to imply that in typical society that rules do not exist, but in a “street survival’ contest we must accept the fact that one of the definitions of  “criminal” behavior  is that such individuals act as though they are outside these rules. In this context and at such occurrences any individual is potentially placed in a predicament where his adversary will likely not limit himself to such “rules”. The “warrior mentality” I am referring to simply is when an individual is aware of such situations and understands when and where such a “survival” mentality must be applied.

SF Advantages

One of the advantages of the “street fighter” is that he is less likely to think beyond the consequences of his immediate action. This allows him to be more spontaneous and less predictable. This is in contrast to more responsible citizens who are concerned with the results of any confrontation beyond simply who “wins”.

The assumed lack of concern is both an advantage and disadvantage to the “street fighter”.  Although it may give a distinct advantage in the immediate moment, it can be extremely harmful to his “survival” beyond that moment, both in society, and legally.

The advantage comes from the lack of hesitation. It is this spontaneous and surprising response or initiation of action that can readily give the advantage in a physical confrontation.  The apparent lack of inhibition to act violently can also be have an overwhelming affect on most adversaries.

A second profound advantage of most “street fighters” is the experience with physical contact during any combative confrontation. There is no substitute for the actually feeling of physical contact in learning the effectiveness or lack of effectiveness of any offense or defense. Further, if a person has never been pushed, pulled, struck, taken down in a vigorous manner, then these types of experiences alone can have a debilitating psychological effect during a real life physical encounter.

The third, strongest advantage of most “street fighters” is the “spirit” to “fight to the end” and not give up regardless of the disadvantages.  This “survival”   mindset (also part of the “warrior mindset” described earlier) could readily be the decisive factor if a confrontation is between two closely matched individuals.

The fourth advantage is the likely unpredictability of many “street fighters”. This element can range from unpredictability of technique to unpredictability of tactics and strategy. This advantage of surprise can be make defense against such an individual more challenging.

SF Disadvantages

Some disadvantages for the “Street fighter” include the following:

First, many such fighters are in unnecessary confrontations. This is significant due to the same logic previously outlined, describing the “driver” who repeatedly takes unnecessary risks while driving. Although these multiple experiences my actually increase individual prowess, at the same time the probability for failure at some point also increases with frequency.

Second, many such combatants enter into confrontations based on ego, pride, fear, revenge, and/or other emotional motivations.  This provides a tendency for their actions to more driven by emotion.  While on one hand, emotions can provide a tremendous amount of energy for a combatant, on the other hand, emotions can also block the ability to function rationally in the most practical manner. This has the potential to cause such an individual to over reach, or go beyond what is practical or necessary leaving himself more vulnerable to defeat.

The “Martial Artist”

We must first define again the characteristics that are included when we refer to the term, “Martial Artist”.  Since this is a general term that covers so many different disciplines, it becomes a challenge to clearly define. So, let’s begin with some general characteristics and then separate the more specific characteristics that can make the most significant difference in the outcome of our “hypothetical” confrontation.

Here are a list of general characteristics of a “martial artist”:

1.) An individual who has had significant formal training (minimum of 3-5 years continuous) in at least one of the many MA disciplines

2.) An individual who has been trained in physical, intellectual, emotional, and spiritual aspects of his MA discipline

Here are some significant characteristics that are legitimate variable not always existent among all MA practitioners, however, have a distinct affect on the results of any real life encounter:

1.) The experience of progressive contact in training that may range from pugilistic contact to stand up grappling, to ground grappling

2.) The experience of competitive encounters in training. This may range from non- cooperative drilling in the dojo to full contact sport competition

3.) Training in the mental/psychological changes and “survival mindset” for combat

MA Advantages

One of the primary advantages of the MA fighter is that he/she has the potential to be a more “disciplined” fighter.  Specifically, it is the lack of wasted effort, physically, mentally, and emotionally that allow such fighters to magnify their potential in a physical encounter.

The principles behind most MA systems teach economy of motion and energy. MA typically teaches that by physically aligning the various systems of the body (muscular and skeletal), and by centralizing nervous energy, emotional energy, and spiritual energy, that more power can be generated than typical for a person of a particular size and stature. Further, the intellectual application of pertinent principles, tactics, and strategies are also likely to give an advantage over an untrained individual who is more likely to react rather than be proactive.

The second advantage is the confidence that occurs as the MA practitioner successfully achieves progressively more difficult goals.  In most MA training, these goals are typically span from physical to intellectual and emotional.

It should be noted that the more practical and realistic the physical skill sets are, the more stable and stronger the intellectual and emotional confidence is likely to be. It is this author’s opinion that MA programs that teach unrealistic defense techniques and/or give the students unrealistic perspectives on the probability of successful application of such skills can easily set the student up for a dramatic failure when faced with real life encounters.

A third advantage may well be the physical conditioning in terms or strength, cardio vascular endurance, stamina, flexibility, speed, and explosiveness that comes with consistent MA training over an extended period of time. Any athlete, amateur to professional will confirm the increase of confidence that comes when that athlete is in top condition.  Particularly in any protracted encounter, conditioning could play as a major factor.

The fourth advantage is more esoteric and much more difficult to measure. This is the human element of morality. Whether this morality is based on the spiritual faith of the MA practitioner or on his human spirit and established values, there is a major difference when a human defends from a position of righteousness.

I have personally witnessed situations where individuals have overcome opponents with great physical superiority primarily due to their strong belief that they were defending what was “right” in their hearts or minds. This element is definitely the “X” factor that potentially plays into any physical encounter.

To be more specific, the properly trained MA fighter is taught to fight only when necessary and typically toward unselfish ends. The phrase, “Might for Right”, was penned by one very famous MA Master.  It is foolish to underestimate the individual who is defending his/her children, spouse, family, or some other person/people and even principle that he feels is dear to him.

Further, the MA fighter properly taught will not extend the fight beyond the minimum necessary to end the threat. This is both a moral and legally pertinent principle. Once the MAF extends himself beyond such self restriction, he looses any such spiritual advantage.

MA Disadvantages

The number one disadvantage of the MA fighter may be a possible lack of experience in “survival” situations. Street survival is distinctly different from sport competition where, regardless of how much contact is allowed, there are still rules, and a referee to stop the fight at some point. This is a mindset that can be developed but must be created over time and with much experience.

Unfortunately, there is an illusion that “full contact” fighting in MA is reality. Although it is certainly very much closer to reality than pretend sparring, in sport MA competition there is no real “full contact”. As long as there are gloves and rules it can never truly be “full contact”. It is still “limited contact” regardless of how grueling or rugged the exchange it may be according to the rules.

The second disadvantage may be the tendency for most trained fighters to follow certain predictable patterns when they fight. This tendency toward predictability can give any opponent a tactical advantage.  With proper training the MA fighter can be taught to be more aware of such predictability and to overcome it with some very specific drills.

The third, and seemly most common disadvantage of many MA fighters, is an unrealistic awareness of the practical application of many of their techniques.  Kicking and punching the air and/or boards and bricks are no substitute for real opponents.  “Sparring” with partners who never touch you simply create illusions that can quickly turn into defeat in real life encounters.

Unless the MA training includes progressive levels of contact, progressive levels of partner interaction (ranging from cooperative to non-cooperative to competitive), and includes some degree of versatility of technique (i.e., not limited to primarily kicking, striking, grappling, etc.) then there will be serious gaps in that fighter’s potential to adapt to many real life encounters.

Comparisons

In many ways it seems that the “Street fighter” has the upper hand, if nothing else, he is in his own environment when he is in a street confrontation. For the MA fighter to prevail he must take advantage of the weaknesses of the SF. The unpredictability advantage of most SF can usually be overcome with confidence and patience. This is because although the Sf is typically “wilder” in his attack or response, those movements are generally less efficient and there are large “gaps” where the MAF can potentially step in and counter or end the confrontation decisively.

The biggest advantage of the MAF is only if he is able to keep his head clear and execute decisively. It is also of primary importance for any MAF to learn and develop a “survival mindset”. The SF has no monopoly on this element, although this characteristic is more typical to already be established with most SFs.

With all factors added in the MAF has the best potential to win, but only if his training is geared to realistic application.

Conclusions

The realistic truth may well be that although there are major advantages to studying, training and developing realistic Martial Arts techniques, it would however make much sense to recognize that Martial Artists who have the opportunity for practical street experience would have the edge and enjoy the benefits of both worlds. As in academic education, one does well to study the rudiments and theory in the classroom but really begins to learn practical application in the real work environment.

Further, the most honest answer to our original question presented here is that there is no absolute answer! As mentioned in the caveat at the beginning of this article, any confrontation ultimately is between the two specific individuals participating and is subject to the pertinent logistics of that encounter.

Even in sport competitions, a “champion” is only the champion of his last encounter. A World Champion is only World Champion until he defends that title again. As martial artists it is important that we be honest with ourselves and face reality. We are not invincible no matter how hard we train or how thoroughly we prepare.

It is important to note that my survival mindset does not include the acceptance of literal defeat.  I have never entered into any real encounter without the clear vision that I would be victorious. My logical mind, however, knows that at some point I can reach a limit. That is because I am human.

This understanding is a good foundation for the philosophical premises that much MA is built upon. Our perspective of “victory” must be much broader than the winning of any particular match or even beyond our own physical life. Part of this is the acceptance that we all will die at some point, whether it be in combat or for some much less dramatic cause.

Therefore, it is much more important how we live our lives, how we touch the lives of others around us, and the manner we accept and even embrace our own mortality.  This is the true “victory” of the “real Martial Artist” and has been reiterated in many forms, from many cultures throughout the world.

So, although it can be interesting and even somewhat amusing to debate “who will beat who”, the bottom line remains the same. It is how we conduct our lives over the time allotted to us that carries the most significance, not some consequential confrontation nor any particular battle.  That is the true essence of the Martial Arts and as we live by those standard we open our potential to be more than conquerors!

“….AND THAT’S THE WAY I SEE IT!”©

Copyright 2010, R.V.Pascetta, all rights reserved.

Go to “Questions/Comments” Page

Shihan Pascetta - Summer Fun

This is a short message to our loyal readers and contributors wishing you all an enjoyable summer. We  have taken a brief break over the last couples weeks and now are ready to resume with new posts, new articles, and positive interaction. Thank you for your patience and we hope to hear from many of you again as we attempt to present current and pertinent topics on the Martial Arts from and insider perspective. There will be a new post by the end of this day and our goal is to have at least one new post/article weekly over the rest of the summer. Ciao for now.

SHIHAN PASCETTA

Shihan Pascetta

As we proceed through life, each of us passes through similar stages of development. We can further subdivide each of these stages to examine Physical Development, Intellectual Development, Emotional development, and Spiritual development. These four “pillars” are the figurative “legs” that support the particular “table” that constitutes each of our lives.

For the serious Martial Artists, the overall journey ultimately becomes a quest to achieve “balance” in each area of development. This “quest” particularly distinguishes the difference between a “Martial Artist” and a “Martial Technician”.  A Martial Artist must also be a Martial Technician, however, a Martial Technician is not necessarily a Martial Artist.

This concept of balance is pursued further by the contrasting and integration between all four of these interdependent facets. The role of the MA Master is to create an atmosphere in the Dojo, along with pertinent activities, that provide a fertile environment for development of each of these four pillars.

The Atmosphere

The atmosphere within the Dojo must include various protocols, first defining the relationship between Master and student. This is seminal to the relationships that follow between all the students of a particular Dojo. Those relationships between students, senior and junior further contribute to this experience.

It is the responsibility of the MA Master to define and exemplify these relationships, both formally and informally; in word and in action. The knowledgeable MA Master understands the significance and impact of the Dojo atmosphere and environment along with the long range affect on the students under his care. Hypothetically, the principles, concepts, and philosophies he aspires to teach are codified in the protocols, procedures, rules, and practices within his particular school.

I use the term, hypothetically, due to the fact that there are many instructors who simply follow habits that they personally observed, experienced, or perhaps found appealing in their own earlier training experience.  These instructors have, however, little clue about the major impact of these practices (or lack thereof) on the development of their students.

This occurs either because their own instructors never taught or explained this integral element of teaching or the current instructor never remained with a qualified Master teacher long enough to learn this aspect. When used properly, this element of the MA training experience (“atmosphere”) can bring immeasurable benefit. Conversely, when absent or distorted, the lack of attention to this element can equally have an adverse affect and serve to produce students that are unbalanced in various ways. Before even one technique is taught, this “atmosphere” sets the stage for everything that follows in a student’s training. When well structured, it has the potential to nurture and support even further progress and development of the individual student.

Ultimately, the students of any particular MA school reflect the principles and mindset taught in that establishment, by that particular “Master”. “The apple doesn’t fall far from the tree.” The following is one example of an important element taught as part of the Martial Arts “mindset”.

Attitude

In the process of everyday life we are consistently exposed to one of only three types of “situations”. I define these “Three Primary“ Conditions” as: 1.) Non-Control; 2.) Influence; and 3.) Control.

“Non-Control”

I choose to begin with “Non-Control” situations because this is the largest category and the most frequent condition we find ourselves in as humans. Regardless of how assertive, positive, intelligent, or physically powerful a person may be, he/she is not omnipotent. There are simply an overwhelming number of factors of conditions that we have  absolutely no control over or even the slightest influence.

For example, let’s consider an occurrence as commonplace as the weather. Although this daily aspect of our lives can have major impact on our lives, we cannot change it. Whether there occurs a sunny day, moderate rain, a tempest, tornado, earthquake, or volcanic eruption, we have no control or capacity to change any of these events, good or bad.

No amount of asking, hoping, pleading, enthusiasm, complaining, or lamenting will add even one more raindrop to the tempest, or one more ray of sunshine to the day, or one less cloud to the sky. This simple reality serves to remind of us of our obvious limitations regardless of all the other amazing human accomplishments.

The list for “Non-Control” situations can go on ad infinum.  I don’t believe that I need to list further examples.

“Influence”

I call the second condition, “Influence”. By this I am specifically referring to situations that you have the potential to change by some action of decision of your own.  For example: You may not be able to “control” whether your car tire goes flat after accidentally hitting a road hazard, however, you can influence the outcome of this situation by carrying a spare tire,  or a can of flat fix, having a cell phone, or even joining a company providing road service.

The list of “Influence” situations is not as expansive as “Non-Control” and is largely a function of the skills and resources that an individual has developed over his lifetime. The important thing to remember is that “Influence” always comes with a price. If you are not willing or able to pay the “price” for such “Influence” then that particular situation actually qualifies better to be categorized as a “Non-Control” situation.

For example, you may be able to “Influence” another person to act in a particular manner. The “price” may be as simple as the time and energy you expended on establishing a positive relationship with that individual. In that example the “benefit” would usually outweigh the “price”.

In contrast, a thief may influence someone to hand over his money or other valuables. In this case, the “price” is the risk of injury and/or imprisonment for the thief if he is apprehended and arrested. Regardless, all “Influence” types of situations come with a “price” that must be paid.

“Control”

The third and least frequent of these conditions, I call, “Control” situations. These are situations over which a person has complete control. In my opinion, these are extremely limited to only one area. That is the area of “Attitude”.

The only area that we have the potential to “control” any significant amount of time is our own “attitude”. And even that  is limited by many factors no matter how hard we try. As humans we were each created with free will. The first free will “choice” we make begins with what “attitude” we choose to embrace.

We can choose to view any situations, occurrence, or experience in the manner we decide internally. The different results are remarkable. Each of us has witnessed the contrast between those people who “see the glass as half-full” or those that “see the glass as half-empty”.

We have witnessed the difference between those who “see a solution in every problem” and those who “see a problem with every solution”. The impact of positive self-view and optimism are well documented in many peoples’ resistance and/or recovery from physical illnesses.

The value of the struggle to develop and maintain an attitude that is life enhancing is one that should not be underestimated.

The Process

The role of the Martial Arts Master to teach and exemplify a mindset that empowers the student to rise above the adversities in life (physical, emotional, relational, social, etc.). A simple formula for the student to follow is:

Step 1

1.)Accurately categorize any challenging situation in life as one of the “Three Primary Conditions”. Please note that the operative word in this step is: “accurately”.

Step 2

2.) In the case of all “Non-Control” situations one must accept the futility of struggling against those things we are unable to change. This resistance to things well beyond our control is simply a waste of our focus and energy.

The key is to learn how to best relax and “go with the flow”. Faith is a valuable tool here to those who accept the tenet that GOD is ultimately in control. Scripture clearly states that “the rain falls on the just and the unjust”; that “all the worry in the world does not  increase a  man’s physical stature even a small amount”; that “GOD turns all things to good for those who love HIM” (according to HIS purposes), etc. By the way, “all” means “all”!

If there is a blizzard on the day of your wedding and no-one can attend, all the complaining and crying in the world will not change the situation one bit. If the stock  market crashes the day after you’ve invested your life savings you cannot turn back the clock. If you are diagnosed with terminal cancer, you are not likely to reverse the diagnosis by shear “willpower”.

However, looking beyond the moment can certainly prepare one to move positively forward even in the face of adversity, calamity, and/or lesser trials. When you are in stuck in traffic and the “idiot” in front of you blocking the road is “making you late” for your appointment, it helps to speculate that perhaps this delay is also “making you late” for some accident up ahead that you may just be missing! Only GOD sees ahead clearly and understands all these “appointments”, both life  enhancing and life challenging.

Step 3

3.) In the case of “Influence” situations one must realistically weigh the “cost” to be paid for influencing any situation. For example, an athlete may “influence” his chance for victory in competition by investing hours, days, weeks, and perhaps years conditioning and preparing for such competition. The real question is whether or not the benefit outweighs the “price” of the investment.

What sacrifices did he have to make in order to invest such time and commitment to training and preparation? How much did his family suffer while he was using this time away from them?  How much did his professional career/livelihood suffer? How did this dedication to his passion for sports impact his other relationships? Was he able to balance the other important aspects of his life while concentrating on his athletic goals?

Another athlete may “influence” his chance for “success” by cheating the rules of play or even by using performance enhancing drugs. Again, the question equally remains as to whether the benefit of “winning” is outweighed by the knowledge that this is a false “victory”. What “price” must be paid if and/or when the truth comes into the light? Further, all that is before one takes into account the physical damage done by the use of such drugs.

These are the type of judgments and decisions each individual must make. We cannot make them for each other. There is, however, no excuse not to learn from other’s actions and consequences.

The bottom line remains the same. If one weighs accurately the “price” to be paid against the benefit to be gained, he is more likely to reach the right decision for his life. In the even that the “price” is greater than the benefit, then it is imperative for the individual to re-categorize that particular situation as “Non-Control”.  Any consistent practice to the contrary will ultimately reduce the quality of one’s life.

Step 4

4.) The third category, “Control” is likely to be a life-long struggle for each person. As I stated previously: “the only area that we have the potential to ‘control’ any significant amount of time is our own ‘attitude’.” Please take notice that I use the term, “potential”.  Remember that “potential” does not automatically imply any guarantee of fulfillment.

There are so many factors that affect our “Attitude”. These can range from our physical state (general health, energy levels, injuries, and even  hormone levels), to our emotional state before even considering many other external influences.  It is important first to recognize that when we have a negative or pessimistic attitude that we sometime become our own “self fulfilling prophesies”.

If we believe we will succeed, it is never a guarantee of success, however, if we believe we will fail, we significantly increase the probability of failure. Logically, it make much more sense to approach life’s challenges with the most positive attitude we are able to muster.

Of all the complex elements that form the psyche of an individual, the “attitude” has the most potential to impact a person’s life more profoundly than anything else internal. Through the control of “attitude” a person can potentially receive the most benefit from his intellect. He can potentially channel the energy that comes from various emotions, both positive and negative. He can influence his own physical health and even his own immune system. He can move along on a pathway to experience the highest quality of life within the parameters of whatever has confronted him.

Conclusions

As Martial Arts Masters, it serves our students well to teach methods that they can use to enhance their entire potential. There is nothing mystical about this process. First, we must learn to practice and develop these elements in our own lives and then do our best to exemplify them to our students.  We must follow the proverbial, “Walk the walk, not just talk the talk”.

Life is truly a struggle for existence from our first breath at birth to our last sigh at death. None can escape this reality.  However, we can use our GOD given intelligence, seeking wisdom, and thereby attempt in our own feeble way to improve the quality of our existence and that of others while we are here. This is the way of the warrior, the way of the Martial Artist.

“….AND THAT’S THE WAY I SEE IT!”©

Copyright 2010, R.V. Pascetta. All rights reserved.

Go to “Questions/Comments” Page